FantasticSearch

1. The cross-border coordination point shall, on the basis of its assessment carried out pursuant to Article 9 and in accordance with the information received under Article 11(3), inform the initiator in writing about the outcome of the procedure, namely:

(a) the outcome of any procedure carried out under Article 11(4), including where relevant, the amendment to any administrative provision or change in practice;

(b) the outcome of a procedure under Article 11(5), including where relevant, the launch of a legislative procedure or the amendment to any legislative provision;

(c) that the cross-border obstacle will not be resolved;

(d) the reasons for any position adopted under point (a), (b) or (c);

(e) the time limit for legal redress under national law if any. For the purposes of point (e), in the absence of such a time limit under national law, the initiator shall be granted six months to request legal redress. The legal redress shall be limited to verifying the respect of procedural rights pursuant to this Regulation.

2. Where the cross-border coordination point or the competent authority has decided to resolve the cross-border obstacle by way of the procedure provided for in Article 11(5), it shall:

(a) inform the cross-border coordination point of the neighbouring Member State;

(b) inform the initiator of the most important steps with respect to the amendment to the legislative provision, including where relevant, to the legislative procedure launched to amend the legislative provision concerned in order to resolve the cross-border obstacle or the final decision closing the procedure. The cross-border coordination point shall also inform the initiator where the competent authority of the neighbouring Member State has launched a legislative procedure to amend a legislative provision.

3. Where the Member State concerned and the neighbouring Member State conclude that each of them is willing to launch a legislative procedure to amend their respective legislative provision, to amend their respective administrative provision or to change their respective practice, they shall do so in close coordination, in accordance with their respective institutional and legal frameworks. That coordination may cover the timing of the procedures and may lead to the establishment of a joint committee with representatives of the competent authorities and the cross-border coordination points, where relevant.